Do not be alarmed. We only mean to ask if he deserves to be punished by being made to rule from Delhi. Afterall he did rule Delhi for 49 days. But he perceived ruling the Capital to be a punishment. So he ran away at the first opportunity.
Now should he be allowed to rule India from the Capital? We would want the voters to decide in May 2014. But the question is he may perceive ruling from the Capital to be a punishment as he perceived ruling the Capital to be a punishment.
Hence the question does he deserve to be punished by being made to rule India from its Capital. Especially when with free water free electricity and free give aways like Kashmir to Pakistan leading to an anarchist free-for-all in the country?
So we return to the question does Kejri deserve the “Capital Punishment”?
HS Editor
Latest posts by HS Editor (see all)
- Love Jihad Case in Parbhani, Maharashtra - 2016/03/21
- NAMO – The image says it all - 2014/05/13
- Putin’s Message for Prime Minister Modi & other World Leaders - 2014/05/04
